In the Phaedrus, Plato has Socrates complain about a dangerous new technology.
Writing.
He says it will produce forgetfulness in the souls of those who learn it. People will stop exercising memory. They'll have the appearance of wisdom without the reality.
He was right, by the way. We did stop memorizing epic poems. We also got libraries, science, and the ability to think about a thing for longer than one person's lifetime.
What's the pattern?
That's the pattern. Every technology that makes thinking faster gets accused of making us dumber. The calculator. The search engine. GPS, which I'll admit really did do something to my sense of direction.
And each time the accusation is half right. The tool takes over a skill. And the question is always the same: was that skill the point, or was it scaffolding for something else?
Here's what's different this time, and I don't say that lightly, because "this time is different" is usually wrong.
The calculator did arithmetic. The search engine did retrieval. AI does the thing that looks like thinking. The draft, the summary, the argument, the answer. It produces the output that used to be evidence you'd done the work.
So thinking doesn't get taken away. It gets made optional. You can still do it. You just don't have to, and nobody will be able to tell from the output.
That's the risk, and it's not a technology risk. It's a habit risk.
I say on stage that AI is a mirror. It reflects, it amplifies, it optimizes. It cannot originate. It cannot discern. It cannot care. And a mirror doesn't make you dumber. It just shows you exactly how much you were bringing to the room.
So who wins? Not the people who refuse the tool. That's the faster-horses move, and it always loses.
The people who win are the ones who use the tool and keep the muscle. Who write the first paragraph themselves before they ask for the rest. Who read the summary and then read the thing. Who ask "who built this, and why, and who benefits" about every answer that arrives too easily.
Clear thinking. Fast discernment. The ability to make a call when the data runs out.
That's the scarce resource in a world where generating an answer is free.
What should leaders do now?
So, three things, especially if you teach.
Grade the thinking, not the output. If the output can be generated, the output isn't the assignment anymore.
Make people show the question, not just the answer. The question is the part the machine can't do for you.
And keep one thing hard on purpose. The struggle was never a bug. It was where the learning lived.
Socrates was worried about the wrong thing. Writing didn't end thinking. It gave thinking somewhere to live.
AI can do the same. If we keep showing up to the room.
What's the last thing you thought all the way through, without asking anything?
Related: Will you have to prove you're human online?
- Plato, Phaedrus, 274c to 275b (Socrates on writing and memory).
More like this on LinkedIn. Follow @samradofficial
